A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between possible neighbours above the development of a wall at a coastal web page in a very north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted countrywide interest subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household property at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods short article about René Collier as well as Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has developed into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design operates at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, find to make their spouse and children home. The situation is now emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of set up people. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web-site, resulting in an encroachment on a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such spots are matter to stringent controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have Long lasting ecological penalties, significantly inside of a delicate coastal atmosphere like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, and that is partially crafted, is in the correct position. Their legal crew has characterised the action being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, the place views of the sea are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations, a picture which has because develop into emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These actions were not simply symbolic; they ended up meant to gather visual proof on the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Times noted, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the h2o through intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the internet site became Among the most placing descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely famous that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a place afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included in detail with the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to grasp the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read additional submissions on regardless of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt design pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial moment within the authorized timeline.
Within the core on the dispute is a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as constructed, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been called meticulous in his evaluation of planning paperwork, maps, and problems attached for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A personal watch, insisting as a substitute that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing relationship to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply seeking to develop a household house in accordance Together with the law. They deny Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that all performs have been carried out dependant on professional guidance and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into The ocean for the duration of a storm, usually do not change the underlying info.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than design of wall at coastal website has grown to be a shorthand description to get a circumstance that many observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become extra contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous the businessman experienced previously been linked to community advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from incredibly various Experienced backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations and René Collier waded through midsection-large h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both the Bodily reality with the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature in the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an excessive technique.
As the High Court proceedings proceed, the result remains uncertain. The courtroom will have to decide if the wall as crafted complies with organizing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.